Qwen2.5-Coder infrastructure

Qwen2.5-Coder Hardware Requirements: RAM and VRAM by Model Size

Qwen2.5-Coder comes in six dense sizes, from 0.5B for editor autocomplete to 32B for a local coding assistant. Coding workloads are context-heavy — whole files, diffs and repository snippets — so the KV cache matters as much as the weights. This page works through AIG's three layers — parametric estimate → actual artifact fit → workload planning — for every size.

LLM RAM and VRAM planning layers: model weight memory determined by quantization, runtime overhead and context reserve for attention and concurrency
Memory planning components. Actual peak RAM and VRAM vary by model artifact, runtime, context and concurrency; this is not benchmark data.

Qwen2.5-Coder hardware requirements: quick answer

Using Ollama's default Q4_K_M files at 4K context, Qwen2.5-Coder needs about 4.9 GB for 7B, 9.8 GB for 14B and 21 GB for 32B once loaded. At the full 32K context those become about 6.6 GB, 15.4 GB and 28.6 GB. In practice: 7B fits an 8 GB GPU, 14B wants 16 GB, and 32B needs a shorter context or a quantized KV cache on a 24 GB GPU — 32K with Ollama's default f16 cache exceeds the card's capacity before runtime overhead. Plan 32 GB or more if you want to give it whole files.

Measured Coder runs: inspect speed and task outcomes together

  • Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B Q4_K_M, 4,096 allocated tokens, Apple M4 Pro 24 GiB, ollama 0.40.3: 154.1 median decode tokens/s, 1.42 GB sampled peak process RSS; 5/15 coding-task executions passed. 5 measured repetitions on 2026-10-19; medium confidence. Run conditions and measurement data →
  • Qwen2.5 Coder 1.5B Q4_K_M, 4,096 allocated tokens, Apple M4 Pro 24 GiB, ollama 0.35.0: 152.5 median decode tokens/s, 1.41 GB sampled peak process RSS; 5/15 coding-task executions passed. 5 measured repetitions on 2026-10-02; medium confidence. Run conditions and measurement data →
  • Qwen2.5 Coder 3B Q4_K_M, 4,096 allocated tokens, Apple M4 Pro 24 GiB, ollama 0.40.3: 37.3 median decode tokens/s, 2.26 GB sampled peak process RSS; 10/15 coding-task executions passed. 5 measured repetitions on 2026-10-19; medium confidence. Run conditions and measurement data →
  • Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Q4_K_M, 4,096 allocated tokens, Apple M4 Pro 24 GiB, ollama 0.40.3: 23.1 median decode tokens/s, 5.04 GB sampled peak process RSS; 10/15 coding-task executions passed. 5 measured repetitions on 2026-10-19; medium confidence. Run conditions and measurement data →

This measured callout applies only to these configurations. The tables below remain calculated estimates; newer unindexed runs are not included.

Sizing framework: three layers

  1. Parametric estimate: parameter count × bits per weight ÷ 8. The fastest calculation, but it ignores quantization overhead and the runtime.
  2. Actual model artifact fit: the exact GGUF, AWQ, GPTQ or safetensors file you will load. Ollama's Q4_K_M files run about 22–28% above the 4-bit floor from 1.5B up, and more for 0.5B (Layer 2).
  3. Conservative workload planning: artifact + KV cache for your configured context + runtime overhead + OS reserve + one cache per concurrent request. For 14B and 32B at long context this layer adds more than a third to the artifact.

Layer 1: Parametric weight estimates

Model16-bit weight floor8-bit floor4-bit floor
Qwen2.5-Coder 0.5B
0.49B parameters
~1.0 GB~0.5 GB~0.25 GB
Qwen2.5-Coder 1.5B
1.54B parameters
~3.1 GB~1.5 GB~0.8 GB
Qwen2.5-Coder 3B
3.09B parameters · Qwen Research license, not Apache 2.0
~6.2 GB~3.1 GB~1.5 GB
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B
7.62B parameters
~15.2 GB~7.6 GB~3.8 GB
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B
14.77B parameters
~29.5 GB~14.8 GB~7.4 GB
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B
32.76B parameters
~65.5 GB~32.8 GB~16.4 GB

CALCULATED. Parameter count × bit width ÷ 8, using the totals reported by each repository's safetensors metadata (the 32B model card rounds its count to 32.5B). Real quantized files are larger — see Layer 2.

Run Layer 1 for your own Qwen2.5-Coder configuration

Starts on Qwen2.5-Coder 14B at 4-bit — the 7.4 GB floor in the table above. Enter another size's parameter count, change the precision, or raise the context reserve to the KV-cache figure from Layer 3 for the context you plan to use.

Why context reserve is manual: exact attention-cache memory cannot be inferred safely from parameter count alone. For a real deployment, measure the specific model and runtime at the context length and batch size you intend to use.

Your next step

This planning estimate is within a base Mac mini's advertised memory tier, but real quantized files, cache and macOS usage may still prevent the model from fitting. Check the exact configuration.

Check this against a Mac mini configuration →

Open the full RAM and VRAM calculator → for the method, the caveats, and how it differs from the artifact-based compatibility checker.

Layer 2: Actual model artifact sizes

Ollama's default Qwen2.5-Coder tags are Q4_K_M quantizations of the instruct models. From 3B upward they work out to just under 5 bits per weight. The two smallest sizes come out higher: their embedding tables — a 151,936-token vocabulary — are a large share of their parameters (over a quarter of 0.5B), and quantization formats typically keep those tensors at higher precision.

Ollama tagSizeEffective bits / weightListed context
qwen2.5-coder:0.5b398 MB~6.532K
qwen2.5-coder:1.5b986 MB~5.132K
qwen2.5-coder:3b1.9 GB~4.932K
qwen2.5-coder / :7b4.7 GB~4.932K
qwen2.5-coder:14b9.0 GB~4.932K
qwen2.5-coder:32b20 GB~4.932K

DOCUMENTED (sizes, quantization and context) and CALCULATED (bits per weight = size × 8 ÷ parameter count). Ollama also lists -base tags of each size at the same file sizes, plus other quantizations on its tags page.

Check Qwen2.5-Coder on my hardware →

Layer 3: Workload planning — KV cache by model and context

Every Qwen2.5-Coder size uses grouped-query attention, but with very different key/value head counts — 2 heads for 0.5B–3B, 4 for 7B and 8 for 14B and 32B. At the default 16-bit cache precision, the cache per token is 2 (K and V) × layers × KV heads × head dimension × 2 bytes. The jump from 7B to 14B is the one to notice: 14B stores more than three times as much cache per token as 7B.

ModelKV cache / tokenLoaded at 4K (Ollama default below 24 GiB)Loaded at 32K (Ollama default at 24–48 GiB)Loaded at 128K (YaRN)
0.5B12 KiB0.45 GB0.80 GB—
1.5B28 KiB1.1 GB1.9 GB—
3B36 KiB2.1 GB3.1 GB—
7B56 KiB4.9 GB6.6 GB12.2 GB
14B192 KiB9.8 GB15.4 GB34.8 GB
32B256 KiB21.1 GB28.6 GB54.4 GB

CALCULATED from config.json. "Loaded" = Ollama Q4_K_M artifact + f16 KV cache at that context. Add 10–20% headroom for runtime allocations, which are not modelled separately. 128K is only available for 7B, 14B and 32B, and only with YaRN enabled (see below).

Can Qwen2.5-Coder 32B run on a 24 GB GPU?

Yes, with a shorter context or a quantized KV cache. On a card exposing 24 GiB (25.8 decimal GB), Ollama's 32K default with an f16 cache needs about 28.6 decimal GB before runtime overhead, so it cannot fit entirely on the GPU. With a q8_0 cache, the subtotal is about 24.3 decimal GB (22.6 GiB), leaving about 1.4 GiB for runtime buffers, display use and other allocations. That is tight: whether it stays fully on the GPU needs measurement, rather than following from the subtotal alone. A conservative starting point is 4K with num_ctx 4096 (or OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=4096): about 21.1 decimal GB with an f16 cache, before runtime overhead. Check the effective context and GPU offload with ollama ps. For more headroom at whole-file or repository-scale context, plan a 32 GB or 48 GB GPU, two 24 GB GPUs, or a Mac with 48 GB or more of unified memory. Compare rental options in the GPU cloud providers guide.

Which Qwen2.5-Coder size fits 8 GB, 12 GB or 16 GB?

8 GB: 7B at up to about 16K context, or any smaller size at the full 32K. 12 GB: 7B at the full 32K, or 14B at short context with about 2 GB of headroom. 16 GB: 14B at up to 32K — about 15.4 GB loaded, so tight with an f16 cache and comfortable with q8_0. 24 GB: 14B with room for concurrency — it fits at Ollama's 32K default for this size — or 32B at a shorter context, with 4K as a conservative starting point.

Which size for autocomplete vs a coding assistant?

Autocomplete and chat are different workloads. Qwen recommends the base models — not the instruct models — for fill-in-the-middle completion, and editor completion has to answer within a keystroke or two, so small base models (0.5B–3B) are the usual choice. They need about 0.5–3 GB, so they can run alongside a larger chat model. Chat, code review and agentic edits benefit from the 14B or 32B instruct models, and are where the context and concurrency costs above apply. For hosted alternatives, see the best AI coding agents guide.

Can Qwen2.5-Coder run without a GPU?

Yes, with Ollama or llama.cpp on the CPU, using the same memory figures from system RAM. The small sizes are practical on a CPU; 14B and 32B are usable for occasional chat but slow for interactive completion, because every generated token reads the full 9–20 GB of weights from memory. See the local AI RAM requirements guide for CPU-only sizing.

Related Qwen sizing decisions

For newer general-purpose Qwen models, compare the 8/16/24 GB memory tiers. For a hosted GPU, use Qwen GPU-cloud planning. These are estimates and published artifact sizes, not measured guarantees.

Sources

Agent Infrastructure Recommendation Kit

Sizing hardware for a local coding model?

The Agent Infrastructure Recommendation Kit carries these memory numbers into a documented local-vs-cloud decision — artifact fit, context and concurrency reserves, and the verification steps to run before you buy.

Get the Recommendation Kit — $19